![the bacis model in spss ibm the bacis model in spss ibm](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/76899/expirable-direct-uploads_2F42f136fe-18fa-40a0-9b32-a45f2b0ffd52_2Fstats_new_1.png)
but in the end, I would still do something about the smell in the shop :-) I often tell them that if they do research for a local shop and the survey shows that 90% of the 400 respondents think it stinks in the shop, the owner could argue about the post-hoc method used, or whether or not a normality test should have been used, and if a parametric or non-parametric test should be used, etc. Of course I also warn them that we do so, so if they ever go into academic university they will probably notice that I did so. They are not doing any theoretical research or for medicines, so feel we can cut a few corners. For my course, the students get a bit of a 'cookbook' on what test to use depending on the measurement level and focus more on properly explaining generic terms like 'significance' and give them an oppertunity to do a basic statistical analysis of their survey.
![the bacis model in spss ibm the bacis model in spss ibm](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Cytoscape_2.png)
I guess it also depends on what the learning objectives are, on what might be best to use. However, if I want to work with Python I just use Python, or for R the same thing :-) Never used the extensions but know about what they would be able to do. Subject: RE: Model Viewer Gone in SPSS 27? of decimals).Īnyway, thanks you saved me an endless search for the option. I liked the Model Viewer for keeping the many outputs of a test with post-hoc analysis organised and not clutter my output file itself, I hated the model viewer since you couldn't adjust anything in it (e.g. Odd that they didn't simply made the pivot tables the default and keep the Model Viewer as an option in the options menu. I think that few users take advantage of this functionality. You could route NPTESTS output to a new window and then move anything you want to keep into your main output window. The OUTPUT NEW, OUTPUT NAME, OUTPUT ACTIVATE, OUTPUT SAVE, and OUTPUT CLOSE commands give you syntax control over Viewer windows. I'm also very happy that the basics don't change and can still use a lot of my instructions from version 19 still in version 27 without the students noticing :-)Īnother thought For better control over output organization, you might consider using multiple output windows. I'm glad version 27 at least gave a few new ones. Or perhaps even generate output like intellectusstatistics does, but I understand that the target audience for SPSS is different and a lot broader. It would be great if SPSS could have more effect sizes with also the nonparametric tests. For them it is the GUI of SPSS that helps them, since CLI (like the syntax or R) will probably be a bit steep learning curve and they mostly use it to analyse a survey. I teach Statistics to students at a university of applied science in the social sciences. It's just a small thing, and was a bit surprised for SPSS to get rid of the whole thing, and not just changing the default. I've also send a feedback via the help option you suggested.